2010/09/20

Line Review - Cortland Sylk (4 seasons on)

I'll be the first to admit that I am not a huge fan of many of the fly lines made or distributed by Cortland. However, there are a few gems in their line-up including the old school 444 (Peach), the 444sl Camo Clear, and the more recently added 444 Sylk.

The Sylk line initially received a lot of press as a synthetic silk line substitute. It's slightly stiff makeup, thin diameter and subtly mottled finish apparently does a passable imitation of the real thing, but it wasn't any of these features that drew me to the product. Indeed, my interest was only aroused when I watched an episode of the locally produced Sportsfishing BC. In it the host peeled the Sylk line off the reel in bitterly cold weather to demonstrate how it "pooled" on the deck of the pram without coiling. Having suffered through many lines that coil like slinkies in the cold (including other Cortland offerings), I was immediately smitten.

After a fruitless search in the local shops I had one of them order the line from the distributor. This turned out to be a crucial mistake as the line took four months to arrive (I discovered later that "small" orders through the Canadian distributors were only shipped with larger purchases and my line fell victim to this problem). Not content to wait, I went on-line and was fortunate to find Herndon rods across the line in Washington state who stocked the line as a complement to their custom bamboo rods.

One line out of the box looks very much like another in most cases, but the Sylk line was a bit different. Unlike most modern lines the first thing that struck me was the subtle cloth-like texture to the finish of the line. The mottled olive gold colouration was also a contrast with the generally brighter monochromatic fly lines available. A quick crimp test on the line indicated no significant "instant" memory issues, and the line diameter was as thin as promised.

On the reel the Sylk line performs as promised with respect to line memory. Even after being spooled on a small diameter Hardy Flyweight for an extended period, the line comes off the reel without coiling. The line shoots very well out of the box and with only the occasional cleaning it has continued to do so for the past four seasons. Its casting profile is definitely enhanced by the relatively narrow line diameter and good weight/length ratio, and on the medium to medium-fast action graphite rods I favour it casts very well. I have tried both WF and DT designs and while I rarely have to cast them any distance, I would give the slight edge to the WF design for my casting style with higher weight rods and the DT for the light and ultralight rods (profile information is available here ).


The Sylk line has a lot of advantages over other floating line varieties, but some of these same advantages also create shortcomings. For example, while the line is an excellent cold water/weather performer, it doesn't do as well in the heat of summer and some have complained that it becomes "sticky" in the heat. While I don't live in a climate where this is a significant issue, I could see this being a problem in areas where the average summer temperature is the high 20's (Celsius) and above. Another issue is with regard to the narrow line diameter, which results in a low floating line--definitely a consideration for some presentations. A final issue of note is with regard to the coating on the line. While this makes for a low memory line, it also means that it doesn't stand up to abuse from abrasion, nicks and the occasional boot against the rocks.

I think it's safe to say that the perfect "all-purpose" line has yet to be invented, and given the variety of rods and fishing conditions out there, I don't think I would want one. For my part I have found the Sylk line works very well on most of the slower traditional action graphite rods and softer tip nymphing rods that I own (eg. Scott g-series, Sage SP & VPS-light, Grey's Streamflex, et al). I particularly like this line for small cold water streams with tight cover that require fairly accurate casts over shorter distances. Based on it's narrow diameter, low floating characteristics and subtle low memory construction, I feel this line is best suited to dry and wet fly presentations in moving water conditions. While I occasionally use this line for stillwater applications in the five and six weight range (particularly in cold weather), higher floating more aggressively tapered lines are perhaps better suited to most stillwater fishing conditions.

Aaron

5 comments:

  1. Found your blog today while looking for line reviews. I'm a fan of this line too, having used it for a full season. ( 65 days to date )

    I'm going to follow your blog, and hope you keep up the reviews?

    I'm@www.smallstreambrowntroutfishing.blogspot.com

    Drop in and follow if you can? Kind Regards.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment. As you can see this is a once in a while blog. I will be adding a few rod reviews in the near future, but it's generally an "as time permits" project.

    Will definitely add you as a follow.

    Aaron

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this informative and interesting blog.

      May I add to this very good review that the line is also very well suited for cast's that starts from the water. Using a #5 line on a #4 rod makes the "pole" deepens further and the "blank" coil for a catapult delivery. The smaller diameter for this line compared to others in the same weight makes it slightly lighter and will not overline the rod... at least not mine. The long level tip (0.6m) anchor the line perfectly in the water and "off it goes".
      Any good suggestion for the best suited fly line dressing for Sylk?

      Delete
    2. I can't offer much in the way of suggested line dressings other than to say it's a very good idea to keep the line clean and supple. For most of my dry lines I use the basic Scientific Angler line dressing. The package comes with a sponge applicator and a cleaning pad (double sided in his case). While I will use the cleaning pad, I apply the dressing and "buff" it using soft flannel rags. I generally dress the line about twice per season--more if it sees heavy use.

      The Cortland dressing pad that comes with most of their current lines isn't a bad product for a quick field dressing and it does help with shooting the line, but for regular maintenance I prefer the SA product. On my sinking lines I use the Umpqua line dressing which doesn't seem to interfere with sinking.

      Aaron

      Delete
    3. Fine! I just started to use this line and I will continue to do so. The presentation is sweet and controlled. A good line.
      Good fishing!

      Delete